I get asked about how to place a detail bubble or a section bubble amongst text notes where the actual leader for the bubble is not desired. The user still wants to have the information within the bubble to auto-update, so the bubble needs to be an actual callout. This is a very common situation, The following image is an example of a typical situation.
This can be done initiating the Section command (or Callout command) from the View tab. Instead of placing the section, go to the Reference panel that appears in the menu and place a checkmark next to the “Reference Other View” option. You can then choose the desired Section or Callout to be referenced from the dropdown list.
After choosing the desired referenced view, place the section in your view and draw the section to display a tail.
In the Propertiespalette, change the section type to a Detail View or other type that does not display the Arrows on the bubble.
Pick on the cycle button next to the tail to cycle to the option where the tail is not shown.
Shorten the line so that it is as close to the bubble as you can get it. You may need to zoom in to do this portion. Note that there must be some portion of the line that exists.
The bubble may now be relocated to the desired position in relation to the text.
Note that this method can be used when desiring to place 2 bubble side by side pointing to the same callout outline.
When and how Revit section markers display on plan views can be a bit confusing when you are working with multiple disciplines. With more disciplines involved with a model, the more noticeable and confusing the issue becomes. This is due to the fact that section markers are discipline-specific and cannot be displayed on all the different disciplines of plan views.
Revit is designed so that section markers will not show in other discplines’ views and this is based upon the Discipline parameter of a view. Revit has 6 different Disciplines available for selection for a view. They are:
Most Revit users have heard that Autodesk has released the 2019 versions of its various software packages. Autodesk has included a lot of nice enhancements with this release and delivered on many of the user wish list items. While there are still many improvements to be made to Revit, I am pleased with enhancements in this release.
Electrical symbol legends are a critical part of electrical design documents and everyone wants to have a Symbols List which automatically updates to show the actual electrical symbols that are placed in a project. That way, the only symbols that are on the list are ones that are actually placed in the model and the list does not include many unused symbols. It is actually possible to do this. When an electrical item gets added to the model, the symbol gets added to the symbol list.
It is that time of year that my Autodesk subscription is up for renewal, so it makes me think about the latest pricing system that Autodesk has been implementing lately.
I had been on the “Subscription” plan for years, but that name was changed to be called the “Maintenance” plan in 2016. The new “Subscription” program is entirely different than the old subscription program even though it has the same name. Yes, that can be confusing.
When designing buildings, we all know that we often get walls that are non-orthogonal and at various angles to the sheet. With those walls, we often want to get an elevation that is parallel to a particular wall. It is actually easy to do.
When adding piping system to a Revit model, it is desirable to label piping systems with their system type so that you see text on the piping line. Some examples of this are HW for Hot Water, CW for Cold Water, and S for Sanitary Waste.
In AutoCAD, piping systems are typically shown by drawing a line with a specific line type that displays the desired text. This works fine since the lines themselves contain no data and are just symbolic. Revit does not allow line types with text in the line like is allowed in AutoCAD. However, Revit makes it super easy to label piping systems with the appropriate text. I believe that the net result is the same, if not better.